“Migrants today are the human element, the vanguard of this globalization and offer us a way of life that will soon be widely used for all of us .” This is the statement, uttered in a somewhat ‘awkward and stunted (but repeated) by the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Hon. Laura Boldrini, last year during a public meeting.
We remember well the reactions of many in front of these words, almost all the time to point out the awkwardness on display from the third position in the State. He escaped to the most – obsessed by the desire to mock a character so disliked – the scope of that statement, which was not the “shot” of un’invasata immigrazionista, but the revelation, indeed embarrassed, of a truth well known to those who, like the current President of the Chamber, know what is behind the phenomenon of immigration and where it goes to parry the intent of the centers of power that have promoted the so-called “globalization”.
Laura Boldrini did not appear suddenly out of nowhere. Her resume speaks for itself: since 1989 working in various agencies of the United Nations, ranging from questions of power to those of migration flows, and going through various international scenarios of crisis. What does that mean? It means that, in all probability, this woman knows the causes and purposes of certain facts.
A year after affirmation mentioned above, another exponent of political power – the Minister of Education, University and Research, Stefania Giannini – issued statements in the wake of those made by Laura Boldrini. A few days ago Huffington Post, reported the contents of a press conference which showcased the minister Stefania Giannini and his German counterpart, Johanna Wanka, which met in Menaggio (Como), upon ratification of a cooperation agreement between Italy and Germany in the field of vocational training.
During the press conference, Minister Giannini has candidly revealed what future is shaping up for the Italian people: flexibility (precariousness) and instability in all spheres of life, from the personal and emotional to the social and labor.
Here is an excerpt of the statement made by Stefania Giannini and reported by the Huffington Post : ” Flexibility means insecurity, which is not synonymous with discomfort”(statement subsequently amended by the Minister, ed) continues Giannini. “We must get used to the idea of a world set to an American-style economic model, where job insecurity is the norm. We must get used to less immediate certainties, made by people who are constantly on the move and we must encourage their movements . ” And again: ” The family as we have known will always exist unless … (the people, the parents in the first place ) you must be able to move individually and why the family unit will no longer have the social stability feature that has had for my generation “ .
And because this way of life just predisposes to bring children into the world, here is the need for migrants, in order to fill those population gaps which necessarily are created. This I explained to the German Minister Wanka, who said: ” Our economic success has not translated into a highly productive children. In 10 years, Germany has lost 22 percent of its population. In these terms, the arrival of migrants has a specific economic function. That is, to occupy the working band left empty by demographic crisis … “.
This, then, is the vision of the future – towards which we proceed for some time and with accelerated motion – that European politicians pursue – either out of conviction, either by obedience or dunce unforgivable personal gain – such as docile instruments in the hands of globalist power. They come, then, the “authoritative” confirmations as long denounce all the cultural and political observers who have understood the meaning of the upheavals taking place: migration, homosexuality, gender ideology, economic and financial crisis … all it takes and is aimed at pursuing the formation of a “new world order”, characterized by the disappearance of the natural family, national and gender identity; a “new world”, inhabited by a shapeless mass, nomadic and mestizo in all aspects (religious, cultural, racial).
This sad scenario, strikes, a devastating, substantial silence of the Church, the hierarchy of which, except for rare exceptions, almost hidden, does not conflict in any way – denouncing nature and purpose – the events mentioned above (obvious effect of ‘ neo-modernist infection that, at least since the Second Vatican Council, infests the Catholic hierarchy). From this point of view, the award of the prize to Pope Francis “Charlemagne”, which took place on May 6, represents a colossal joke: the prize named after one of the spiritual fathers of Christian Europe, delivered by the destroyers of ‘ Christian Europe who should defend Christian Europe, but clearly does not.