Everyone generalize, both us and anti-Whites. After all, to prejudge or generalize something or some situation is something all people do every day. It is a natural thing to do. Can you imagine how impractical it would be to question everything all the time? Besides, it is what has kept us alive over the ages. When our ancestors encountered a wild, dangerous looking animal they did not take any chances. Their previous experiences taught them to be wary of the unfamiliar and careless assumptions could get them killed. The flip side, of course, is that if we generalize on a limited experience it can go wrong. If we meet certain people, of a football team for example, and we think they are rude we can make the mistake to assume that all people in that team are rude. So while we should acknowledge the fact that we are generalizing, and that it can have clear benefits in most situations, it is also important to remember it can also be wrong.
The difference between us and anti-Whites, the people who call themselves “anti-racist, is that they think they are free from having prejudices, and that makes them almost incapable of seeing their own prejudging attitude.
In debates, on TV or elsewhere when the topic of prejudices is up for discussion, it is always framed in the way that prejudice is something White people have against non-Whites. It is not debated that multiculturalists, as they call themselves, generalize White people in a negative way nor is it ever discussed that they generalize non-Whites in the Third World in a negative way. When the debate is framed in this way it is suggested to the viewer that Whites are the ones full of prejudice and hate. Alternatively, that people who oppose immigration is the ones with the negative prejudging attitude whereas the so called multiculturalists are the good guys free from all generalization and prejudging.
The prejudging attitude of anti-Whites is something most of us are aware of. The problem is that people do not recognize it as prejudice before someone points it out to them. Anti-Whites quite often show their prejudging attitude, although most people do not seem to notice it. At least not on a conscious level since this would most likely have been pointed out already.
Despite their many prejudices, there are mainly two prejudices all anti-Whites have in common that stands out. This is what we will focus on in this article. One is the prejudice they have against White people, the other is the prejudice they have against non-Whites, which perhaps is the most inconspicuous to most people.
How they conceive White people as arrogant, unfairly privileged and egoistic
Like in history lessons, the focus is always on the negative when anti-Whites talk about our people. They will be the first ones to accuse Whites of being racists or that we discriminate. When our people are a subject of discussion, it is always negative. For instance, rather than mentioning technological breakthroughs that have benefited people all over the world on a daily basis or even allowed us to travel to the moon and exploring the universe, it is much more preferred to talk about slavery and colonization as unique crimes of White people.
We hear all the time how we supposedly are “on top of the food chain” oppressing everybody else for own selfish gains, not mentioning anything about how our ancestors fought, worked and died for the good fortune we now are able to enjoy. We never hear about “unfair privilege” for the Chinese in China or any other non-White country, we only hear this in White countries.
It is bad to portray Muslims as terrorists or immigrants as lazy, criminal, welfare recipients. But it is perfectly normal to portray Whites as arrogant, unfairly privileged or egoistic. A lot of anti-Whites give our people these bad characteristics. This is part of the anti-White mentality. This is part of their way of demonizing White people. People would react more if it was blacks or Muslims that always were being negatively portrayed.
Furthermore, this treatment would have been condemned as anti-semitism had this been applied to Jewish people. But portraying Whites in a negative way is often referred to as anti-racism or tolerance. They fail to see the irony when they on one hand condemn and criticise people who hold similar negative views of Muslims or Africans, while at the same time having such a prejudiced and negative view of us Whites.
If someone says something negative about another group of people, they immediately think it is stated by a White person who is being “racist” against another group.
Their negative prejudices against non-Whites
Funnily enough, anti-Whites do not only have prejudices against us Whites, they also have many prejudices against non-Whites whom they claim to sympathize with.
In fact, they actually look down on non-Whites. Like children, they believe that they cannot take care of themselves and that they cannot manage without us meddling in their affairs. That is why they are strong supporters of discrimination laws such as affirmative actions laws and the like, as if they did not believe in the notion that non-Whites are competent enough to get positions of their own on their own accord. Consciously they say it is because non-Whites are victims of racism of course, but non-Whites are always victims in the anti-White mindset. It is also why they are the first ones to scream racism whenever someone suggest that we should not have open borders, despite the fact we are becoming a minority and the fact that there are many other good places in the world to live in that is not majority White.
We often support the idea that we should help non-Whites return to their countries with perhaps an education so that they may rebuild their countries and make their countries an even better place to live in, but anti-Whites always argue against this idea. They seem to believe that this is an impossible feat, as in their subconscious belief system non-Whites cannot take care of themselves. To leave matters to their own affairs is simply not possible for them.
After all, the main reason they portray non-White countries as a bad place to live is because that makes it easier for them to justify non-White immigration.
Just a bunch of hypocrites?
For a group who claims to possess no prejudices against any races or peoples they sure hold a deep grudge and resentment towards White people. Not only that, they view non-Whites as inferior and have strong prejudices against their homelands, seeing how in their mind they cannot possible take care of themselves and they demonize the whole Third World by saying that none of their countries are good enough to return to.
The reason they have so many prejudices is because they think they are free from prejudices.
As we have said before if we look upon so called “anti-racist” arguments as objectively against racism they can seem to be very inconsistent. But if we look upon these arguments as just being anti-White we will see they are 100% consistent. Everything they say is always an attempt to argue for more non-White immigration into White countries.