Whenever the topic of immigration comes up for debate (doesn’t matter if it’s in a formal or informal setting) and someone concerned about the consequences of the current open border policy suggests that it is time halt immigration and help as many as possible to return to their own countries, liberals are always quick to denounce the idea and demonize the person making the suggestion.
We have previously written about antiwhites subconscious bad view of the Third World, and it is a point worth repeating. They seem to think that every nonwhite country is ravaged by war and poverty and that only white countries are worth living in, since they are implying that it would be inhumane for people to return to their own homelands.
Even if this may be true in some cases, it is definitely wrong to assume that only white/Western countries are worth living in. After all, it is not war and poverty in all of Africa or the Middle East. Implying that just show that they have a very stereotypical and condescending view of foreign places.
But another point that we also want to stress in this article is:
Isn’t it the liberals/leftists who are always saying that immigration is such a good and wonderful thing? Then how can it be bad to let people migrate to other nonwhite countries (especially considering that we supposedly have “institutionalized racism” in white countries)?
Why don’t they cheer on when someone is suggestion remigration? Shouldn’t immigration be good for the Third World developing countries? After all, they are ones saying that diversity is a strength.
Or perhaps liberals are of the opinion that Mexico, or any other nonwhite country for that matter, is not a land of opportunity like the US or other white/Western countries?
“People should be able to live wherever they want” might be an immediate response to the above from the liberal. However, if this was truly the case then we wouldn’t hear them talk about forcing integration if being allowed to live wherever was so important.
It seems like they don’t really believe in the idea that immigration is automatically good no matter the quantity.
Could it be that it’s just something they say to justify more non-stop immigration into white countries?
In a nutshell, whenever immigration occurs into white/Western countries it is a good thing, but when immigration occurs out of white/Western countries it is a bad thing. At least in the antiwhite mindset.