It’s a logical follow-on to the previous post to ask why Whites are not in fact fighting back against their dispossession. Far from taking up arms to drive out the invaders and execute the traitors Whites don’t even take the risk-free alternative of the secret ballot.
The fundamental cause of White (especially White male) passivity is down to the endless cradle-to-grave multi-faceted propaganda directed against everything White, straight, Christian and masculine. No need to elaborate on this other than to suggest that this may be powerful enough to actually alter the target’s brain chemistry, in effect making White males different people to what they would have been. It also forces them to ask the question ‘why should we fight if we’re so bad?’
Trends towards smaller families, ever easier divorce, weaker ties due to a rootless itinerant globalist lifestyle and targeting White neighbourhoods/regions for enrichment all undermine White social cohesion and trust, and hence the possibility of organised revolt.
Women, especially younger White women, are highly xenophilic. They’re the ones usually holding the REFUGEES WELCOME signs and poll after poll shows them voting for open borders and against ‘right wing’ candidates. Obviously virtue-signalling is an important motivator with vacuous young women but there’s also an evolutionary psychology dimension. “For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age”
Male testosterone levels are plummeting, and rebel leaders will always be high T. Maybe that’s why we don’t have any. And all revolutions need leaders.
On a more prosaic level we have to understand the potential down-side for any straight White male stepping outside the PC reservation. An indiscreet word is enough to get him charged for “hate speech”. At a minimum this means heavy legal fees, probably a fine or even a jail sentence and loss of his job. With a criminal record his alternative employment prospects are dim. His family will also be dragged in to public odium. He also knows that the police, judicial system and military contain a rapidly decreasing ratio of straight White men like him. He’ll realise that blacks, Muslims, queers and Jews in those positions will be willing to pull the trigger, both literally and metaphorically.
Finally there’s the issue of priorities. We see in poll after poll, and we know it from our own personal experience, that White people are opposed to the ongoing mudslide engulfing their countries. Yet they continually vote in political parties that clearly have no intention of stopping it. Despite the facts I outlined above it seems clear to me that Whites just don’t see this issue as their top problem. Their primary drivers seem to be economic in the broadest sense. Employment, taxes, inflation etc.
Which leads me back to a contention I’ve been making for many years. Namely that Whites will not rebel in the absence of a catastrophic economic melt-down. And here I’m not referring to the likes of 2008, rather to that of the thirties or even worse. The irony is that by allowing invaders from the Third World swamp our countries we will become more like the Third World with every day that passes. The defining characteristic of the Third World is poverty. And that’s the level of poverty that will finally drive Whites to rebel. Problem is by that time in many cases they’ll be strangers in their own lands, their time passed….